This analysis explores how telecommuting influences active travel behaviors in the Netherlands, implying insights for mobility policy.
Telecommuting has been proposed as a strategy to promote sustainable mobility, yet its impact on active travel remains unclear, particularly when considering socio-demographics and telecommuting-related behavioral changes. To address this gap, this study investigates the relationships between telecommuting frequency, telecommuting-related behavioral changes, and the frequency of walking, conventional bike use and e-bike use in the Netherlands. Using data from the 2022 Netherlands Mobility Panel, we estimated a Bayesian Network model. Results show that moderate telecommuting (2–4 days/week) is associated with higher walking frequency, while full-time telecommuting (5+ days) generally is linked to lower likelihoods of frequent conventional bike and e-bike use. Moreover, respondents who reported ‘started to make more trips’ showed higher probabilities of using conventional bikes, whereas those who “started travelling on other days” exhibited distinct patterns of e-bike use, including greater probabilities of occasional use. Additionally, e-bike ownership corresponds to more e-bike use while coinciding with lower possibilities of frequent walking and conventional bike use, indicating a substitution effect. These findings provide empirical insights for policymakers seeking to design telecommuting and mobility policies that encourage active travel. • Analyzed telecommuting and active travel using a Bayesian Network framework. • Moderate telecommuting (2–4 days/week) is associated with higher walking frequency. • Full-time telecommuting (5+ days) is related to frequent bike and e-bike use. • Making more trips is linked to higher probabilities of using conventional bikes. • E - bike ownership is related to lower walking frequency and conventional bike use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: