K-12 leaders examine AI's impact on educator practices, revealing potential benefits and challenges.
Beyond its implications for learning and instruction, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be expected to also affect the working conditions and practices of all educators – including teachers, building and district leaders, and other non-teaching staff in K-12 schools. This study examined K-12 educators’ possible uses of AI and their potential benefits and risks as perceived by K-12 leaders, as these perceptions are likely to influence decisions on which uses of AI may be allowed in their schools and, thus, the extent to which all K-12 educators may realize AI’s potential to support their work. Based on interviews conducted in October-December 2023 with 36 Western New York building and district leaders, the study identified and analyzed four complementary categories of possible uses of AI by K-12 educators - depending on whether AI is used for (a) routine tasks, (b) instructional tasks, (c) back-office/school operations, and (d) decision-making. Each category elicited a different set of perceived benefits and concerns as well as different levels of acceptance from the K-12 leaders interviewed, thus suggesting the value of a more nuanced approach in future studies of the implications of AI for the work of K-12 educators. Having decision-makers experience using AI in their own work was also identified as critical to more informed and balanced decisions about AI uses in K-12 schools. Building on the “Future of Work” literature as well as studies on implications of “hybrid human-AI intelligence” for education, this study highlights the implications of approaching AI as an “assistant” rather than a “replacement” for K-12 educators, while also contributing to the debate of whether AI may become a “disruptive technology” for K-12 education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borasi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: