Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study finds UGT1A1 variation correlates with HCM risk in Europeans, suggesting a heterozygote advantage.
Version 2 represents a complete shift in the study's focus due to an honest methodological mistake in the original draft. While running the automated pipeline for Version 1, I accidentally pulled the wrong Polygenic Score (PGS) model. Instead of the intended cognitive model, the script used a model for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM; model ID: PGS004911). Fortunately, the underlying extraction of the UGT1A1 gene and all statistical calculations were mathematically sound. This means the significant correlation I observed (p=0.0064) was actually a real link between the UGT1A1 variant and polygenic risk for HCM. Given that mildly elevated bilirubin (Gilbert's Syndrome) is widely known for its cardioprotective and antioxidative benefits, this accidental discovery actually makes a lot of biological sense. As a result, I have entirely rewritten the manuscript. Version 2 leaves neurocognition behind and explores a new, cardiovascular hypothesis: that the UGT1A1 polymorphism might act as a natural compensatory buffer (heterozygote advantage) for people with higher genetic risk for heart issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Łukasz Lewandowski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: