Phenomenological analysis reveals identity influences psychological burden, suggesting time is interpreted, not directly felt.
This paper presents a phenomenological investigation of time, arguing that lived temporality is not directly perceived but interpretatively constructed through narrative self-awareness. It distinguishes between physical change, scientific time as measurement, and psychological time as narrative continuity. The study proposes that existential burden emerges when identity unconsciously identifies with conceptual temporality. By integrating insights from Husserl, Heidegger, Bergson, and relativity theory, the paper situates time as interpretation rather than as a primary experiential datum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayank Singh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: