PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in Solid Organ Cancer Patients with Embolic Stroke – A Case Series

RLRonda LunPSParshva ShahBTBenjamin A. Teasdale

Key Result

Patent foramen ovale was detected in 20% of solid organ cancer patients with embolic stroke who underwent bubble study, with paradoxical embolism identified as likely mechanism in 45% of PFO patients.

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how common patent foramen ovale (PFO) is in solid organ cancer patients experiencing embolic strokes.
  • Searched Stanford Research Repository for adults with solid organ malignancies suffering from a specific type of stroke
  • Included only those with echocardiograms featuring bubble studies
  • Conducted chart extraction for clinical and radiographic data
  • Utilized descriptive statistics to analyze the findings
  • Fifty-five patients were examined with a median time of 65 days from cancer diagnosis to stroke
  • 20% (11 out of 55) of patients had patent foramen ovale
  • Paradoxical embolism was determined as a likely stroke mechanism in 45% of those with PFO
  • 43.6% of patients had metastases, with 38.2% transitioning to comfort care during hospitalization

Study Design

Type

Case Series (n=55)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
55 adults (≥18 years) with solid organ malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin and primary CNS cancers) who suffered an ischemic stroke secondary to an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 1 year after their cancer diagnosis, and had an echocardiogram with bubble study. Mean age 70.9, 45.5% female, US-based (Stanford).
O
Outcome
Prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO)

In patients with solid organ cancer and embolic stroke, PFO is present in 20% of cases and frequently co-occurs with asymptomatic venous thromboembolism, supporting the use of screening lower extremity ultrasounds in this population.

Limitations

  • Retrospective, single-center study design
  • Small sample size limits generalizability
  • Possible detection bias due to differential screening for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in PFO positive patients
  • Low sensitivity of transthoracic echocardiography may underestimate true PFO prevalence
  • Lack of a control group without cancer
  • Patients mainly from a tertiary referral hospital with advanced/metastatic cancer, limiting population representativeness
  • Highly selective nature of the case series (selection bias)
  • Small sample size limiting generalizability
  • Detection bias (screening ultrasounds done more frequently in patients with PFOs)
  • Low sensitivity of transthoracic echocardiography for detecting PFOs
  • Crude (unadjusted) rates raising the possibility of bias and confounding

Abstract

AbstractBackground Cancer-associated stroke has become increasingly recognized as a subcategory of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently cited as a common stroke mechanism in this population, but its prevalence in an ESUS cohort with newly diagnosed cancer is unknown. Objective To determine the prevalence of PFO in patients with solid organ malignancy and ESUS. Methods We searched the Stanford Research Repository for adults with solid organ malignancies who suffered a stroke secondary to an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 1 year after their cancer diagnosis. Only subjects who had an echocardiogram with bubble study were included. Chart extraction was completed for clinical/radiographic information. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the data. Results Fifty-five patients were included. Median time from cancer diagnosis to stroke was 65 days (IQR 11–182). The most common primary cancer site was lung (25.5%); 43.6% had metastases; 21/55 (38.2%) transitioned to comfort care during hospitalization. The prevalence of PFO was 20% (11/55). Paradoxical embolism was identified as a likely mechanism of stroke in 5/11 (45%) patients with PFO based on co-occurring venous thromboembolism (VTE). In 4/5 patients, VTE was asymptomatic and diagnosed based on screening studies at presentation. Conclusion The prevalence of PFO among cancer patients with ESUS was 20%, and there was a high (45%) rate of co-occurring VTE. Given the high rates of asymptomatic detection of VTE identified based on screening ultrasounds, these results could support screening for VTE in this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lun et al. (2026) conducted a case series in solid organ malignancy and embolic stroke (n=55). Patent foramen ovale was detected in 20% of solid organ cancer patients with embolic stroke who underwent bubble study, with paradoxical embolism identified as likely mechanism in 45% of PFO patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3f9ede8e28729cf64409https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2026.108597
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper