Develops a predictive model for maximum surface roughness in welded joints, suggesting optimization paths for surface finishing.
Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) enables precision post-weld finishing of AISI 304 stainless steel, but stochastic spark overlaps make the fatigue-critical maximum peak-to-valley height (Rmax) difficult to predict. This study develops a validated physics-based framework quantifying how crater overlap governs Rmax evolution. Experiments on unwelded AISI 304 cylinders—proxying weld metal while excluding heat-affected zone (HAZ) effects—used Central Composite Design (20 trials, 900–9380 μJ discharge energies). Profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) correlated the crater size, overlap intensity, micro-cracking, and Rmax escalation from 18 to 85 μm. Primary and secondary crater formation under minimum and maximum overlap configurations were simulated using a 2D axisymmetric finite element model with Gaussian heat flux and temperature-dependent thermophysical properties. The predictive metric Rmax,num = (dinitial + dsecondary)/2 achieved 11–19% average error against the experimental Rmax,exp, with complementary valley depth (Rv) validation at 13% error. The Specimen 7 outlier (~50% error) reveals the limitations of deterministic modelling under stochastic debris accumulation and plasma instability at intermediate energies. Crater overlap generates secondary dimples, sharp inter-crater peaks, and rim micro-crack networks, driving the 4.7-fold Rmax increase—approaching International Institute of Welding (IIW) fatigue thresholds (<25 μm for high-cycle categories). The framework explicitly links the discharge energy, plasma channel radius (Rpc), and overlap geometry to surface topography, enabling process optimization (I·ton < 60 A·s maintains Rmax < 25 μm). Mesh independence (<2.5% convergence) and six centre-point replicates (CV = 4.2%) confirm robustness. This validated upper-bound Rmax predictor supports the digital co-optimization of welding and EDM parameters for aerospace/energy applications, with planned extensions to stochastic 3D models incorporating adaptive remeshing and real weld topographies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forouzanmehr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: