Key result
Radiofrequency catheter ablation achieves ~88% procedural success in WPW patients with left-sided accessory pathways.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for left-sided accessory pathways based on their localization along the mitral annulus.
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation effectively eliminate left-sided accessory pathways in patients with manifest WPW syndrome regardless of anatomical localization?
Observational (n=58)
No
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation effectively eliminate left-sided accessory pathways in patients with manifest WPW syndrome regardless of anatomical localization?
p-value: p=0.348
Radiofrequency ablation of left-sided accessory pathways is highly successful and safe across all mitral annulus localizations, though lateral and posterior pathways require longer procedure times and more radiofrequency pulses.
Supports RFCA efficacy across left-sided AP sites in WPW; leaves open randomized confirmation of location-specific techniques and recurrence.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia due to its proven safety and effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of this treatment for left-sided accessory pathways in 58 consecutive patients with manifest preexcitation who were treated at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje. The procedure duration varied significantly (p<0.05) depending on the localization of accessory pathways along the mitral annulus (anterior 60.0±26.0 min; anterolateral 45.2±28.4 min; lateral 73.9±27.9 min; posterolateral 59.1±25.5 min; posterior 83.1±29.6 min), as did the number of applied radiofrequency pulses (anterior 9.0±4.5; anterolateral 4.3±4.7; lateral 8.1±5.8; posterolateral 4.0±2.9; posterior 8.1±4.2; p<0.05). Fluoroscopy exposure time did not differ significantly (p=0.078). Atrial fibrillation was recorded in 15.5% of patients prior to the procedure. For the ablation of left-sided accessory pathways, the transaortic approach was used significantly more often (74.1%) than the transseptal approach. There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of primary procedural success (100% for anterior and anterolateral, 82.1% for lateral, 100% for posterolateral, and 88.9% for posterior; p=0.672), recurrence rate (10.7% for lateral and 5.5% for posterior; p=0.023), or final success rate, defined as definitive cure (100% for anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral, 94.8% for lateral, and 89.3% for posterior; p=0.421). Despite the increased time and more radiofrequency energy pulses necessary for ablating laterally and posteriorly positioned accessory pathways, the procedure's success rate remained comparable regardless of accessory pathways location along the mitral annulus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grbović et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with left-sided accessory pathways (n=58). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) was evaluated on Primary procedural success defined as complete elimination of accessory pathway confirmed by absence of preexcitation on ECG post-ablation (p=0.348). Radiofrequency catheter ablation achieved a primary procedural success rate of 87.9% in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and left-sided accessory pathways.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: