A survey reveals gaps in enforcement mechanisms for human rights in Kenya's courts, suggesting improvements necessary.
Human rights law in Kenya is enshrined within its constitution but enforcement remains a challenge for domestic courts. A structured questionnaire was distributed among judges, legal practitioners, and academics in Kenya's key regions. Quantitative data were collected through online surveys and analysed using descriptive statistics. The survey revealed that while some mechanisms are effective (e.g., judicial review), significant gaps exist, particularly regarding the enforcement of non-custodial rights such as freedom of speech and assembly. Despite efforts, courts face challenges in balancing human rights with other legal obligations. Recommendations focus on enhancing training for judges and developing clearer guidelines for court procedures. Enhance judicial education programmes to improve understanding of human rights laws and their enforcement; develop comprehensive procedural manuals for domestic courts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kagwe et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: