Cross-sectional survey examines group norms and team identity's role in anti-doping behaviors among adolescent athletes, suggesting practical educational interventions.
Background While anti-doping education programs have expanded globally, their effectiveness in collectivist cultural contexts remains poorly understood. Existing research has largely focused on individual-level psychological factors, overlooking how group-level social dynamics interact to shape health behaviors in intensive team-based training environments where both normative pressures and identity processes operate simultaneously. Objective To examine whether and how group norms influence anti-doping behaviors among Chinese adolescent amateur athletes, and to test team identity as a potential mediating mechanism in this relationship. Methods Cross-sectional survey of 1,718 adolescent athletes (mean age 18 years) from sports schools across 15 Chinese cities. Structural equation modeling tested direct effects of group norms on anti-doping behaviors and indirect effects through team identity as a mediator. Results Group norms were strongly associated with anti-doping behaviors ( β = 0.54, p < 0.001). However, team identity exhibited a negative mediating pattern in this association (indirect effect = −0.194, accounting for 35.8% of total effect), revealing a paradox: while anti-doping norms show a positive association with healthy behaviors, the concurrent strengthening of team identity is statistically associated with an attenuation of this relationship. This negative mediation suggests that team-level interest coalitions can create conflicting pressures that complicate health promotion efforts in sports settings. Conclusion This study identifies a dual-pathway social mechanism through which group norms and team identity jointly shape adolescent athletes’ anti-doping behaviors in collectivist sports settings. From a practical perspective, the findings suggest that anti-doping education programs should move beyond individual-focused knowledge delivery and explicitly incorporate team-level strategies, such as shaping shared norms, engaging peer leaders, and aligning team identity with health and ethical values. Interventions that strengthen team cohesion without addressing underlying performance-driven identity pressures may be insufficient or counterproductive. These findings provide actionable guidance for designing culturally adapted anti-doping education programs that leverage group norms while managing the potential risks associated with strong team identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: