Compares B cell responses to different COVID-19 vaccine platforms, indicating tailored regimens may enhance immunity.
Improving long-term protective immunity elicited by prime-boost vaccinations requires a deeper understanding of the immunologic outcomes of different vaccine platforms. Given the variety of platforms used to develop vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, we reasoned that SARS-CoV-2 offered an opportunity to compare vaccine platforms in humans. We used flow cytometry and single-cell transcriptomics to explore the B cell response to different homologous and heterologous vaccine regimens. We found that an adenovirus vector prime followed by a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine boost showed the greatest short-term B cell expansion and preferentially elicited an activated atypical B cell subset that was associated with antibody binding titers against spike protein. In contrast, an mRNA primary series followed by homologous boost induced a different activated B cell subset with more proliferative potential and high frequencies of a long-lived resting memory subset. Moreover, immunoglobulin A (IgA)–expressing memory B cells had more somatic hypermutations than the predominant IgG-expressing B cell population. This heterogeneity in vaccine-elicited B cell responses underscores the potential of tailoring vaccine regimens that combine different platforms to achieve potent and durable protection against infectious diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: