Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Joint analysis examines dark matter behavior using multiple cosmic observables, suggesting new insights into gravity.
Title:Testing dark-matter Euler modifications with cosmological motions: A joint RSD–lensing–gravitational-redshift analysis in aninformation-gauge framework Submitted as a revision to Nuclear Physics B. Summary We present a phenomenological and model-agnostic framework to test whether the dark-matter velocity field obeys the standard Euler equation implied by General Relativity (GR), or exhibits effective deviations parameterized as Modified Euler (ME) dynamics. The approach combines complementary large-scale structure observables: Redshift-Space Distortions (RSD) (velocity-sensitive clustering) Weak gravitational lensing (Weyl potential ΨW=(Φ+Ψ)/2Ψ_W=(Φ+Ψ)/2ΨW=(Φ+Ψ)/2) Gravitational redshift / relativistic clustering estimators (targeting a direct potential channel ΨdirΨdirΨdir, with controlled systematics) The joint analysis enables: Consistency checks of GR in the dynamical sector (velocity–potential relation) Null tests for gravitational slip using ΨWΨ_WΨW versus ΨdirΨdirΨdir Forecasting and sensitivity projections for near-future survey combinations Contents This record includes: The full PDF of the revised manuscript (v1.0) (figure-generation code and auxiliary files are provided in a separate Zenodo record or repository.) Reproducibility and use The analysis is designed to be reproducible and extensible. Any code and/or scripts associated with figure generation are referenced in the manuscript and may be released separately with versioned updates. Citation If you use this material, please cite: This Zenodo record (DOI assigned by Zenodo) The associated article (journal reference to be updated upon acceptance) License Please select a license consistent with your intended reuse policy (e.g., CC BY 4.0 for the manuscript files, and MIT for code if released separately).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ju Hyung Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: