Key result
Abnormal MPR or MI linked to MACCE in T2D, with combined presence increasing prognostic value.
Why the study?
The incremental prognostic value of abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve and myocardial infarction for predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus is unknown.
Does abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve and myocardial infarction predict MACCE in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=572)
Yes
Does abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve and myocardial infarction predict MACCE in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
In patients with T2DM, the presence of both abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve and myocardial infarction on CMR provides incremental prognostic value for predicting MACCE.
AIMS: In individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), both myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction (MI) are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The incremental prognosis of both risks is unknown. We aimed to investigate whether abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), as a surrogate marker for ischemia and presence of MI offers incremental prognostic value in predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective multicentre cohort of 572 individuals with T2DM and healthy controls underwent quantitative stress myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to determine MPR and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to identify MI. Patients were divided into three groups: MI- and normal MPR, MI+ or abnormal MPR and MI+ and abnormal MPR. Cox proportional hazard models quantified associations between MPR and MI with MACCE (composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and late coronary revascularization>90 days after the CMR scan). Over a median of 28 months (IQR 25-31 months), 81 participants (14%) accrued at least one MACCE, including 25 (4%) deaths. Presence of either abnormal MPR or MI was associated with increased MACCE (MI- and normal MPR: 8% MACCE; MI+ or abnormal MPR: 15% MACCE (adjusted HR compared with normal 1.86 (95% CI 1.06-3.25, P = 0.03)); presence of both MI and abnormal MPR had the highest event rate: 30% MACCE (adjusted HR compared with normal 3.24 (95% CI 1.75-6.01, P < 0.001)). CONCLUSION: In T2DM, abnormal MPR or MI are associated with MACCE, and the presence of both offers incremental prognostic value.
Sharrack et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=572). Presence of both myocardial infarction and abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve vs. No myocardial infarction and normal myocardial perfusion reserve was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and late coronary revascularization >90 days) (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.75-6.01, p=<0.001). The presence of both myocardial infarction and abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve in T2DM was associated with increased MACCE compared to normal.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: