Key result
Coronary embolism causing MI shows similar in-hospital mortality to non-embolic MI despite more complications.
Why the study?
Does myocardial infarction secondary to coronary embolism have different clinical characteristics and prognosis compared to non-embolic myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=8,160)
No
Does myocardial infarction secondary to coronary embolism have different clinical characteristics and prognosis compared to non-embolic myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 6.4%
p-value: p=0.321
Myocardial infarction due to coronary embolism is rare (1.1%), predominantly caused by atrial fibrillation, and is associated with higher rates of mechanical complications and in-hospital strokes compared to non-embolic MI, despite similar overall mortality.
CE-MI may warrant closer in-hospital monitoring for complications; observational data leave open whether targeted strategies alter prognosis.
AIMS: Limited data are available regarding aetiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of coronary embolism (CE). This study aimed to describe the clinical features of embolic myocardial infarction (MI) and compare them with non-embolic MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: All admissions for acute MI in a single tertiary centre between January 2010 and December 2023 were reviewed. Coronary embolism was diagnosed by established criteria. Among 8160 patients, 89 (1.1%) were diagnosed with CE. The most common attributable cause was atrial fibrillation (AF) (52.8%), followed by prosthetic valve thrombosis (11.2%) and endocarditis (7.9%). Compared with the remaining patients, those with CE were more frequently female, had a lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, and presented more often with ST-segment elevation (79.8 vs. 58.6%, P < 0.001). Coronary embolism patients had a high frequency of unsuccessful reperfusion and higher rates of mechanical complications (5.6 vs. 2.2%, P = 0.031) and strokes/transient ischaemic attacks (6.7 vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) than those with non-CE MI, although in-hospital mortality was not statistically different (9.0 vs. 6.4%, respectively, P = 0.321). In a propensity-matched analysis among hospital survivors (77 in each group), no differences were observed over a median follow-up of 59.6 months in overall mortality or thrombo-embolic events after discharge, although more patients in the CE group were admitted for heart failure. CONCLUSION: Coronary embolism is mostly caused by AF, usually presents with ST-segment elevation, and is associated with higher rates of mechanical complications and in-hospital embolic events, but not of recurrent thromboembolism after discharge. No significant differences in mortality were observed between CE and non-CE MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvo‐Barceló et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=8,160). Coronary embolism vs. Non-embolic myocardial infarction was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.321). Coronary embolism causing MI was associated with more mechanical complications and strokes/TIAs than non-embolic MI, but in-hospital mortality was similar (9.0% vs 6.4%, P=0.321).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: