The study investigates value co-creation's clarity in marketing literature, suggesting frameworks for improvement.
Conceptual clarity is fundamental to accumulating knowledge in marketing science. This study investigates the construct of value co-creation to assess its conceptual clarity in the academic literature and inform broader theory development in marketing. Drawing on a systematic literature review and statistical analysis of 1224 peer-reviewed articles, we find that while conceptual clarity has improved over time, it remains fragmented. Surprisingly, marketing- and service-focused journals do not exhibit higher conceptual clarity than adjacent fields; moreover, journal ranking correlates negatively with conceptual clarity, whereas author affiliation with prestigious institutions correlates positively with conceptual clarity. To advance the field, we propose a conceptual framework that distinguishes between process and systems perspectives of value co-creation and outline future research avenues grounded in this distinction. We contribute to marketing theory by delineating the value co-creation concept and offering actionable tools for enhancing conceptual clarity, thus supporting more coherent further theorizing and empirically robust research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makkonen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: