Wildland fire behaviour is strongly governed by the coupled effects of wind and terrain slope, yet the literature remains fragmented across experimental, empirical, mathematical, and physics-based modelling traditions. A systematic scoping review with narrative synthesis was performed (Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar plus citation chaining), screening studies for explicit wind–slope treatment with reported forcings and outcomes. Across more than 150 studies, slope benches, wind tunnels, trenches/canyons, and field burns show that upslope–wind alignment promotes flame attachment and a shift from radiation-led to convection-led preheating (often near 20–30° slopes and moderate winds), whereas opposing or downslope forcing lifts flames and suppresses spread; confined geometries can trigger eruptive acceleration. Mathematical analogues and empirical models provide fast predictions using compact wind/slope modifiers and enable scenario and burn-probability mapping but typically prescribe coupling and miss regime transitions. Physics-based LES/CFD and coupled atmosphere–fire systems resolve terrain–flow feedback sand can yield reduced-order laws suitable for embedding into operational tools, albeit at higher computational cost and with validation gaps. Benchmarks are consolidated, approaches are compared using a common rubric (fidelity, validation, applicability, cost, and operational utility), and priorities are identified for cross-scale datasets, firebrand transport in complex terrain, and real-time coupled prediction.
Hayajneh et al. (2026) studied this question.