Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of fire dynamics during prescribed burning reveals crucial interactions between slope and wind in mountainous pine forests.
Prescribed burning is important for reducing wildfire risk and regulating fuel loads, but its implementation in mountainous forests is strongly influenced by the coupled effects of the wind field and topography, making it difficult to control. This study focuses on Yunnan pine (Pinus yunnanensis) forests in southwestern China. A three-dimensional Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) combined with measured fuel characteristics was used to simulate 21 slope (0–35°) and wind speed (0–2 m s−1) combinations to quantitatively analyze the fire spread, flame structure, and gaseous emission characteristics during downslope prescribed burning. The local fire spread rate (ROS), evaluated along three lateral lines (Y = 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m), exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on slope over the tested range, with a minimum near 30° and a modest rebound at 35°. A downslope wind of 1 m s−1 promotes near-surface heating and accelerates spread, whereas a stronger wind of 2 m s−1 lifts flames away from the fuel bed and suppresses combustion. Thermal field analysis reveals that peak temperature decreases with increasing slope and that a late-stage secondary heating episode occurs at 35°. CO2 emissions are significantly positively correlated with fuel consumption, reaching a peak of 717.5 kg under a 35° slope and no-wind conditions. CO emissions, as an indicator of combustion efficiency, reach their highest value of 2.23 kg at a 35° slope and a wind speed of 1 m s−1, indicating that their trend is not entirely consistent with the ROS and temperature and that there is a certain degree of decoupling. The interaction between slope and wind speed transforms fire behavior from a cooperative to a competitive mechanism, and the topography–wind field coupling provides differentiated control over the combustion intensity and completeness. This study provides a scientific basis for the safe implementation of mountain burning programs and for regional carbon emission assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: