Pilot study demonstrates improved knowledge and attitude in bystander intervention after CPR training.
BACKGROUND: Basic life support (BLS) is a critical life-saving intervention that must be taught in the community, highlighting the important roles of education and policymakers. This study aims to assess the effect of combined basic CPR training on knowledge, attitude, and bystander intervention as a pilot study to address obstacles in CPR education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present quantitative quasi-experimental pre-and post-intervention study was conducted among final-year radiology, radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, and environmental health engineering students using a validated questionnaire that included demographics, knowledge, and attitude information. The necessity of CPR training in schools and universities was assessed through two questions, along with an evaluation of the incorporation of basic life-support (BLS) training courses into the curricula of all Iranian universities, which was measured through one question. RESULTS: Post-intervention BCPR knowledge, attitude, and social responsibility scores were significantly higher than pre-intervention scores ( P < 0.05). The negligence score increased post-intervention, insignificantly ( P = 0.6). Moreover, the level of perceived stress in emergency situations post-intervention was significantly lower than pre-intervention ( P = 0.004). Regarding the necessity of BLS training, the scores in both groups was high. However, post-intervention group score was not significantly higher than the pre-intervention group ( P > 0.05). Of the participants, 50% in the pre-intervention group believed BLS courses should be mandatory for all universities in pre-intervention group. It significantly improved to 64.7% in post-intervention group ( P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study can provide a comprehensive vision for medical universities. Thoughtful planning and consideration of various factors can foster the development of BLS in medical and non-medical universities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamidi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: