Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A real-world retrospective cohort study identifies risk factors and develops a prediction tool for bracket bonding failure in orthodontics, indicating improved clinical risk management.
Based on real-world retrospective cohort data, this study aims to identify risk factors for fixed orthodontic bracket bonding failure, develop a risk prediction model, and create a visualized online predictive tool for individualized clinical risk management. A total of 5,808 tooth positions from 286 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment during January 2021-January 2024 were analyzed. Using tooth position as the analysis unit and patient as the clustering unit, a multivariable Logistic regression model was constructed via generalized estimating equations (GEE) to identify independent risk factors for bracket bonding failure. A standard Logistic regression model was established for prediction. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration test, and Bootstrap resampling. A web-based dynamic prediction tool was developed based on the prediction equation. Bonding failure occurred at 548 tooth positions (9.44%), involving 239 patients. The GEE model identified plaque index, gingival index, hard food biting, bruxism, molar position, ceramic bracket, and use of intermaxillary elastics as independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). The prediction model exhibited an AUC of 0.613 (95% CI: 0.588–0.633). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a P-value of 0.419, and the Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.6027. The developed online dynamic tool provided real-time outputs including the predicted failure probability for a single tooth position, corresponding risk level, and clinical recommendations. Bracket bonding failure is multifactorial, linked to oral hygiene, habits, tooth position, and bracket type. The well-calibrated prediction model and accompanying online tool can aid clinicians in risk assessment and support personalized treatment planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: