PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Head & Face Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Tooth-level risk modeling and prediction of fixed orthodontic bracket bonding failure: a real-world retrospective cohort study

YDYonghua DengNQNi QuanSSShumei Song

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify factors contributing to fixed orthodontic bracket bonding failure and to create a risk prediction model.
  • Analyzed 5,808 tooth positions from 286 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • Used generalized estimating equations (GEE) for multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors.
  • Developed a standard logistic regression model for predicting bonding failure probability.
  • Evaluated model performance through ROC curve analysis, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and Bootstrap resampling.
  • Created a web-based dynamic prediction tool for real-time risk assessment.
  • Bonding failure occurred in 548 tooth positions (9.44%), affecting 239 patients.
  • Key risk factors identified include plaque index, gingival index, hard food biting, bruxism, molar position, and ceramic bracket.
  • The prediction model achieved an AUC of 0.613, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow P-value of 0.419, indicating good calibration.
  • The dynamic prediction tool provides individualized risk assessments and clinical recommendations.

Abstract

Based on real-world retrospective cohort data, this study aims to identify risk factors for fixed orthodontic bracket bonding failure, develop a risk prediction model, and create a visualized online predictive tool for individualized clinical risk management. A total of 5,808 tooth positions from 286 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment during January 2021-January 2024 were analyzed. Using tooth position as the analysis unit and patient as the clustering unit, a multivariable Logistic regression model was constructed via generalized estimating equations (GEE) to identify independent risk factors for bracket bonding failure. A standard Logistic regression model was established for prediction. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration test, and Bootstrap resampling. A web-based dynamic prediction tool was developed based on the prediction equation. Bonding failure occurred at 548 tooth positions (9.44%), involving 239 patients. The GEE model identified plaque index, gingival index, hard food biting, bruxism, molar position, ceramic bracket, and use of intermaxillary elastics as independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). The prediction model exhibited an AUC of 0.613 (95% CI: 0.588–0.633). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a P-value of 0.419, and the Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.6027. The developed online dynamic tool provided real-time outputs including the predicted failure probability for a single tooth position, corresponding risk level, and clinical recommendations. Bracket bonding failure is multifactorial, linked to oral hygiene, habits, tooth position, and bracket type. The well-calibrated prediction model and accompanying online tool can aid clinicians in risk assessment and support personalized treatment planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288590a974eb0d3c04305https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-026-00599-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper