This analysis compares Ti/Au and ITO/Ti/Au contacts in β-Ga2O3, revealing performance differences and implications for device applications.
This study characterizes Ti/Au (20/80 nm) and ITO/Ti/Au (20/20/80 nm) Ohmic contacts on doped n-type β-Ga2O3 epilayers using circular transmission line measurements, current-voltage characterization, Arrhenius analysis, and thermal stability testing. Both contacts achieve excellent specific contact resistivity of 1.3–1.5 × 10−5 Ω cm2 at 498 K (225 °C) with nearly identical activation energies of 74 meV (Ti/Au) and 76 meV (ITO/Ti/Au), confirming thermionic field emission as the dominant transport mechanism controlled by the Ti/Ga2O3 interface. Ti/Au exhibits 40% lower room temperature contact resistivity, while ITO/Ti/Au shows comparable performance at 498 K and provides optical transparency for optoelectronic applications. Thermal stability testing at 550 °C reveals catastrophic degradation of ITO/Ti/Au relative to Ti/Au, establishing maximum safe operating temperatures of approximately 225 °C for ITO/Ti/Au and greater than 300 °C for Ti/Au. Both schemes suit β-Ga2O3 power devices operating at 150–200 °C with selection based on transparency requirements and temperature margins, while recent breakthroughs using ultrathin 5 nm Ti layers (versus traditional 20 nm) demonstrate stable operation up to 600 °C through epitaxial anatase TiO2 formation, suggesting pathways beyond conventional thick Ti layer limits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: