This review explores how exosomes influence neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease, suggesting therapeutic avenues.
Objective: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, with neuroinflammation as core pathological drivers. The NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β signaling pathway acts as a pivotal mediator of PD-related neuroinflammation, while exosome serves as key regulatory mediators of this pathway. This review systematically synthesizes the molecular mechanisms underlying exosome-mediated modulation of the NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β axis in PD. Methods: We screened PubMed and Embase databases from January 2010 to January 2025 to search for published studies. The search keywords used are as follows: [“Parkinsonl” or “PD”], [“exosome”], [“NLRP3” or “inflammation”], [“acupuncture” or “electroacupuncture”]. Studies on human/animal models were included, and articles that did not meet the requirements were excluded. Results: Exosomes exert dual regulatory effects on the NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β axis, with functional divergence determined by their cellular origin. From a pro-inflammatory perspective, exosomes derived from microglia and neurons are enriched in NLRP3, ASC, α-syn oligomers, and pro-IL-1β. After endocytosis by target dopaminergic neurons or surrounding microglia, these exosomes trigger mitochondrial ROS overproduction and intracellular K⁺ efflux—two critical signals for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. This leads to the assembly of the NLRP3-ASC-Caspase-1 complex, subsequent cleavage of pro-IL-1β/pro-IL-18 into mature cytokines, and exacerbation of dopaminergic neuronal pyroptosis. Notably, α-syn oligomers carried by these exosomes also enhance fibril formation in recipient cells, further amplifying NLRP3 activation and α-syn propagation; for example, microglial exosomes from MPTP-induced PD mice show 2– 3-fold higher NLRP3 expression compared to wild-type controls. Conclusion: The exosome-NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β axis mediates PD pathology. Targeting this axis holds promise for PD, and future research ought to optimize its clinical translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: