Retrospective analysis reveals survival differences between anemic and nonanemic myelofibrosis patients, suggesting alternative therapies.
Characterization of real-world outcomes in ruxolitinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis and anemia is limited. This retrospective analysis of the US Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database focused on patients with myelofibrosis who did or did not have anemia and received ruxolitinib. More baseline anemic vs nonanemic patients received <20 mg/day of ruxolitinib throughout the first 3 months post baseline (25% vs 16%), and baseline anemic patients had numerically shorter times to first dose reduction (median, 5.6 vs 12.8 months) and discontinuation (16.7 vs 24.8 months). Median survival was significantly shorter in baseline anemic vs nonanemic patients (37.4 vs 64.9 months [p < .001]) and in patients receiving ruxolitinib <20 vs ≥20 mg/day (40.1 vs 53.1 months [p<.05]). Regardless of baseline anemia, patients with new/worsening anemia on ruxolitinib had significantly worse survival (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.18-2.40]; p<.01), suggesting that alternative therapies to ruxolitinib warrant evaluation in patients with myelofibrosis and anemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuykendall et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: