Why the study?
Existing rule-based ECG algorithms for accessory pathway localization are time consuming, prone to inter-observer variability, and treat delta wave polarity as binary.
Does an ECG-based multi-task deep neural network improve the prediction of accessory pathway location in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome compared to conventional algorithms?
Does an ECG-based multi-task deep neural network improve the prediction of accessory pathway location in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome compared to conventional algorithms?
A deep neural network based on ECG data significantly outperforms conventional rule-based algorithms in localizing accessory pathways in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, potentially improving preoperative planning for catheter ablation.
Background Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome is characterized by accessory atrioventricular pathways (AP) and atrio‐ventricular re‐entry arrhythmias. Catheter ablation approach and success are determined by AP location. Existing rule‐based algorithms based on the electrocardiogram (ECG) are time consuming, prone to inter‐observer variability and use delta wave polarity as a binary variable. To overcome these challenges, we propose a model based on a deep neural network (DNN). Methods Patients with concealed pathways, multiple antegrade conducting pathways or without any sinus rhythm ECGs were excluded. AP location was determined based on electrophysiological testing during catheter ablation and categorized into right‐sided, septal and left‐sided APs. Multi‐task learning with auxiliary identification of the presence of pre‐excitation, parahisian pathways and locations where a transseptal puncture is potentially required was used to increase usability and performance. The DNN was compared to the Milstein and Arruda algorithms. Results Between 1997 and 2023, 645 patients who underwent catheter ablation for an AP were included in the study. The model was developed using 1.394 ECGs from 567 patients. The DNN was tested using 78 ECGs in two independent cohorts. The model outperformed both the Milstein and Arruda algorithms with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of .92 (95% confidence interval: .88–.96) compared to the Arruda algorithm (AUROC of .80; p <.001) and the Milstein algorithm (AUROC of .81; p <.001). Conclusions Our model showed excellent discriminatory performance in predicting the location of an accessory pathway while outperforming conventional techniques. Clinically, this tool can improve preoperative planning and risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hennecken et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: