Key result
locAP AI algorithm identifies accessory pathway locations with ~86% accuracy, outperforming established tree-based algorithms.
Why the study?
Exact accessory pathway localization in WPW syndrome relies on invasive electrophysiologic studies with inherent risks, whereas 12-lead ECG localization circumvents this risk but has limited diagnostic accuracy.
Does an AI-based algorithm improve the accuracy of identifying accessory pathway location in WPW syndrome patients compared to established tree-based algorithms?
Observational (n=357)
No
Does an AI-based algorithm improve the accuracy of identifying accessory pathway location in WPW syndrome patients compared to established tree-based algorithms?
p-value: p=< 0.0001
An AI-based algorithm using 12-lead ECG delta-wave polarity provides superior accuracy in localizing accessory pathways in WPW syndrome compared to traditional tree-based algorithms.
May aid accessory pathway localization in WPW; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
(1) Background: The exact anatomic localization of the accessory pathway (AP) in patients with Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome still relies on an invasive electrophysiologic study, which has its own inherent risks. Determining the AP localization using a 12-lead ECG circumvents this risk but is of limited diagnostic accuracy. We developed and validated an artificial intelligence-based algorithm (location of accessory pathway artificial intelligence (locAP AI)) using a neural network to identify the AP location in WPW syndrome patients based on the delta-wave polarity in the 12-lead ECG. (2) Methods: The study included 357 consecutive WPW syndrome patients who underwent successful catheter ablation at our institution. Delta-wave polarity was assessed by four independent electrophysiologists, unaware of the site of successful catheter ablation. LocAP AI was trained and internally validated in 357 patients to identify the correct AP location among 14 possible locations. The AP location was also determined using three established tree-based, ECG-based algorithms (Arruda, Milstein, and Fitzpatrick), which provide limited resolutions of 10, 5, and 8 AP locations, respectively. (3) Results: LocAP AI identified the correct AP location with an accuracy of 85.7% (95% CI 79.6–90.5, p < 0.0001). The algorithms by Arruda, Milstein, and Fitzpatrick yielded a predictive accuracy of 53.2%, 65.6%, and 44.7%, respectively. At comparable resolutions, the locAP AI achieved a predictive accuracy of 95.0%, 94.9%, and 95.6%, respectively (p < 0.001 for differences). (4) Conclusions: Our AI-based algorithm provided excellent accuracy in predicting the correct AP location. Remarkably, this accuracy is achieved at an even higher resolution of possible anatomical locations compared to established tree-based algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Senoner et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome (n=357). locAP AI (artificial intelligence-based algorithm) vs. Established tree-based algorithms (Arruda, Milstein, and Fitzpatrick) was evaluated on Correct identification of the accessory pathway location among 14 possible locations (95% CI 79.6-90.5, p=< 0.0001). The locAP AI algorithm identified the correct accessory pathway location with 85.7% accuracy (95% CI 79.6-90.5), significantly outperforming established tree-based algorithms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: