Mixed methods assessment highlights legal efficacy through integrating traditional and formal justice systems in South Sudan, suggesting a path forward.
Post-conflict South Sudan faces significant legal challenges in establishing a stable and effective legal framework. A mixed methods approach combining qualitative interviews with quantitative survey data to evaluate legal practices and perceptions among key stakeholders. Survey results show a significant reliance on traditional dispute resolution mechanisms (72%) despite the presence of formal legal institutions, indicating a need for integration rather than replacement. The mixed methods study highlights the importance of integrating traditional justice systems with formal legal frameworks to enhance legal efficacy and acceptance. Policy recommendations include strengthening interagency cooperation between traditional leaders and government officials to facilitate smoother transitions and ensure comprehensive legal coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: