Key result
ARNet outperforms cardiologists and standard methods in apical rocking classification with an AUC of ~0.98.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Visual assessment of apical rocking requires expertise and has inter-observer variability, while existing machine learning methods fail to model apical motion.
Does ARNet improve Apical Rocking classification in echocardiographic videos compared to existing algorithms and cardiologists?
Does ARNet improve Apical Rocking classification in echocardiographic videos compared to existing algorithms and cardiologists?
ARNet, a novel self-supervised machine learning architecture, outperforms existing algorithms and cardiologists in classifying apical rocking from echocardiograms, potentially improving CRT patient selection.
May improve CRT patient selection via enhanced apical rocking classification; extends self-supervised machine learning beyond existing methods and cardiologists.
Apical Rocking (AR) is an echocardiography-observable marker of the interventricular dyssynchrony. In clinical routine, it serves as a critical indicator to determine whether the treatment via cardiac resynchronization therapy would be effective for heart failure. However, AR classification based on visual assessment by cardiologists requires clinical expertise and is subject to inter-observer variability, and we find that existing end-to-end machine learning methods are suboptimal on AR classification as they fail to model apical motion – a local but non-trivial key factor for AR. In this study, we propose ARNet for automatic AR classification by explicitly learning apical trajectories from echocardiographic videos. The architecture incorporates a branch that autonomously generates labels for self-supervised apical trajectory learning, eliminating dependency on costly manual annotations. In parallel, ARNet contains another branch which processes echocardiographic frame sequences to capture apical coordinate regression information, thereby enhancing temporal consistency in trajectory estimation. ARNet facilitates knowledge transfer between its dual branches and performs cross-fusion on their features to generate the final predictions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARNet achieves superior performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.981) compared to state-of-the-art action recognition algorithms (AUC = 0.927) and even cardiologists (AUC = 0.918), highlighting its potential to enhance clinical decision-making and resource allocation in heart failure management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question. ARNet achieved superior apical rocking classification with an AUC of 0.981, outperforming state-of-the-art methods (AUC 0.927) and cardiologists (AUC 0.918).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: