Key result
Deep learning accurately automates detection of apical rocking to assess left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony.
Why the study?
Routine assessment of apical rocking in echocardiography remains qualitative and reader-dependent, necessitating automated detection methods.
Does a video-based deep-learning pipeline accurately detect apical rocking in echocardiographic videos of patients with heart failure undergoing CRT evaluation?
Observational (n=351)
Yes
Does a video-based deep-learning pipeline accurately detect apical rocking in echocardiographic videos of patients with heart failure undergoing CRT evaluation?
A deep learning algorithm combining spatial endocardial segmentation with temporal sequence modeling can accurately identify echocardiographic apical rocking in patients with heart failure.
May offer objective apical rocking detection in CRT candidates; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective outcome validation before clinical use.
Apical rocking (AR) is a dynamic echocardiographic manifestation of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony, but routine assessment remains qualitative and reader-dependent. This retrospective two-center proof-of-concept study developed and externally tested a video-based deep-learning pipeline for automated AR detection in a selected cohort of 351 patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) evaluation. The framework first applied a U-Net-based segmentation model with a shape-prior module to delineate the LV endocardium and suppress non-anatomic background information. Segmented video sequences were then classified using a convolutional neural network (CNN) with long short-term memory (LSTM), with a CNN+Transformer model evaluated as a comparator. The segmentation model achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.956 in the held-out test set. In the 56-patient external test cohort from the second center, the CNN+LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.96, specificity of 0.87, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.95. These findings support the technical feasibility of segmentation-constrained spatiotemporal learning for detecting expert-defined visual AR. Because the classification cohort was enriched for AR and excluded poor-quality examinations, the results should not be interpreted as performance in an unselected screening population. The study did not evaluate CRT response or clinical outcomes. Prospective multicenter validation in consecutive, multi-vendor cohorts that include suboptimal-quality examinations and longitudinal outcomes is required before clinical implementation. Keywords Apical rocking; cardiac resynchronization therapy; deep learning; echocardiography; left ventricular dyssynchrony; video analysis
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) evaluation (n=351). CNN+LSTM deep learning model vs. Expert visual assessment (consensus) was evaluated on Automated apical rocking detection accuracy in the external test set (95% CI 0.81-0.96). A video-based deep-learning pipeline (CNN+LSTM) detected expert-defined apical rocking with an accuracy of 91%, sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 87%, and an AUC of 0.95 in an external test cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: