Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals negative links between corporate children’s rights engagement and profitability, suggesting tensions with financial outcomes.
Intergenerational justice is a core principle of sustainability, yet empirical metrics on the impact of business on future generations remain scarce. Moreover, evidence suggests that different ESG scores capture distinct dimensions of corporate responsibility, highlighting the need for more targeted assessments. This study examines the relationship between corporate engagement with children’s rights and financial performance using a dataset of 1672 firm-year observations, combining a novel children’s rights benchmark with Refinitiv’s financial and sustainability metrics. Results indicate a negative association between marketplace ratings, assessing firms’ child welfare considerations in marketing, and accounting-based profitability, even when controlling for ESG subscores. However, no similar relationship emerges in stock market performance. These findings highlight potential tensions between corporate responsibility and short-term financial outcomes, emphasizing the role of regulatory frameworks and stakeholder engagement in balancing financial and social objectives. • We introduce a novel dataset to measure corporate compliance with children’s rights. • We find a negative link between child-friendly marketplace behavior and profitability. • This link is robust to the inclusion of general ESG measures. • There is significant between-sector variance for accounting but not market measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiebke Szymczak (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: