Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates X chromosome inactivation in mice, highlighting implications for embryonic development.
This study aimed to establish a model for investigating X chromosome inactivation using transgenic mouse strains expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). The D4/XGFP-Tg (XGFP) strain carries the GFP transgene on the X chromosome; therefore, due to random X chromosome inactivation, female offspring from crosses between XGFP males and CD-1 females exhibit mosaic GFP expression. In contrast, the B5/EGFP-Tg (EGFP) strain harbours autosomal integration of the same reporter construct, resulting in uniform GFP expression in progenies. Analysis of CD-1 × XGFP attached blastocysts revealed strong GFP expression in giant trophoblast cells and primordial germ cells (PGCs) at E6.5, demonstrating paternal X-chromosome reactivation. In 14.5-day-old CD-1 × XGFP female embryos and CD-1 × EGFP embryos, intense CAG promoter-driven GFP signals were detected in the brain, heart, gonads, somites, and limbs. In line with random X-chromosome inactivation, only 56% of embryonic fibroblast cells, derived from CD-1 × XGFP female embryos, exhibited GFP expression. These findings validate that CD-1 × XGFP mice represent a valuable in vivo model for studying X chromosome inactivation during early embryonic development and PGC specification. Furthermore, CD-1 × XGFP embryonic fibroblasts represent a valuable in vitro model for investigating the molecular mechanisms governing X-chromosome activation and inactivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbán et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: