Evaluates toxicity using red blood cells in biosensor applications, indicating an effective preliminary approach for biomedical research.
Red blood cells represent a widely used cellular model in cytotoxicity studies, particularly in hemocompatibility assessments. As enucleated cells, which are abundant and easily accessible in both humans and animals, red blood cells allow for rapid, reproducible, and low-cost evaluation of the toxicity of bioactive compounds, whether natural, synthetic, or nanoparticulate. From a functional perspective, the red blood cell membrane is highly sensitive to physical and chemical environmental changes (osmolarity, temperature, pH, and the presence of oxidizing agents). This sensitivity makes red blood cells an effective biosensor for detecting membrane damage, hemolysis, oxidative stress, methemoglobin formation, and aggregation processes. Therefore, in vitro tests using red blood cells allow for the preliminary evaluation in preclinical development, particularly for the early screening of cytotoxicity, membrane-disruptive effects, and hemocompatibility of small molecules, nanomaterials, and blood-contacting biomaterials. These techniques include hemocompatibility tests, evaluation of oxidative and osmotic damage, and evaluation of erythrocyte aggregation and function. However, the use of red blood cells as a cytotoxicity model also has significant limitations. As anucleate cells, erythrocytes lack organelles such as nuclei, mitochondria, or lysosomes, which prevents the evaluation of their effects on key intracellular processes such as protein synthesis, cell signaling, apoptosis, or endoplasmic reticulum stress. This lack of cellular complexity limits their usefulness as a sole model in studies of systemic toxicity or tissue-specific cytotoxicity. These tools offer an effective preliminary approach to anticipating risks in biomedical and pharmacological research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romo-Sáenz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: