Why the study?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect targets for ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to electroanatomical mapping?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect targets for ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to electroanatomical mapping?
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can non-invasively identify targets for ventricular tachycardia ablation by detecting channels that correlate with deceleration zones on electroanatomical mapping.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal data link CMR channels to deceleration zones; leaves open validation for non-invasive VT targeting in humans.
Non-invasive detection of targets for VT ablation is possible with CMR. Deceleration zones found during electroanatomical mapping accurately correlate with CMR channels, especially those with increased length, BZ mass, and protectedness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vázquez‐Calvo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: