PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Anbar university Journal for Islamic Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Examples of Narrators Described by Ibn Hibban (who died in 354 AH) as Deluded in his Book 'The Criticized Hadith Narrators - the Weak and the Abandoned': A Comparative Study

M-Maryam Sufian Sami Salih -University of AnbarM-Mazin Mizhir Ibrahim -University of Anbar

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore Ibn Hibban's categorization of narrators as deluded and compare these views with other scholars.
  • Inductive analysis of Ibn Hibban's remarks on narrators
  • Critical evaluation of terms like 'delusion' and 'misconception'
  • Comparative assessment with earlier and later imams of criticism.
  • Ibn Hibban's judgments align with those of recognized hadith scholars
  • Identified three specific narrators critiqued by Ibn Hibban
  • Conclusion synthesizes key findings regarding narration credibility.

Abstract

Praise be to Allah, and may blessings and peace be upon our Messenger, His family, and all His companions. The scholars of hadith paid great attention to preserving the Sunnah, protecting it from error, distortion, and alteration. They clarified the status of its narrators through criticism and verification, to distinguish the truthful ones from the liars, and the alert from the inattentive ones. The scholars used various terms for criticizing and evaluating narrators, with different meanings and varying degrees. Among the terms used for criticizing narrators are 'delusion' 'err' and 'misconception'. To study all these aspects, the authors have conducted this study entitled "Examples of Narrators Described by Ibn Hibban (died in 354 AH) as Deluded in his Book 'The Criticized Hadith Narrators - the Weak and the Abandoned': A Comparative Study." It aims to study Ibn Hibban's opinions in these terms and compare them with the opinions of the recognized imams of criticism and verification who preceded him or those who came after him. The study also tries to clarify the extent to which he agrees or disagrees with them. To achieve the purposes of the study, the authors have adopted inductive, analytical, critical, and comparative methods in this study. The study concludes that Ibn Hibban's judgment on these narrators is consistent with the opinions of the recognized imams and scholars of criticism and verification. The study presents the opinions of three narrators and ends with a conclusion outlining the most important results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

- et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d21d6127c7a504bfe03https://doi.org/10.34278/aujis.2026.191006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Narrators in whom the Sayings of the Critical Imams Differed, whether Distorted or Modified: A Comparative Critical Study2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Ibn Ḥajar’s Thoughts On Criticism Of Hadith Narrators: A Study Of The Book Lisān Al-Mizān2024
  3. 3The Narrators Who Were Described as Strange According to Al-Dhahabi and Ibn Hajar in the Books Al-Kashif and Al-Taqreeb - A Comparative Study2024
  4. 4Lifting the Blame from the Criticized: Including Those from Whom Imam Al-Bukhari Narrated a Single Hadith [Al-Tabi'in (The Followers) as an Example2024
  5. 5"Lifting the Blame from the Speaker" Including those from whom Al-Imam Al-Bukhari Narrated a Single Hadith [Al _Tabi’n(The followed Narrators) as an Example]2024