Formalisation of regime stability using invariant thresholds across domains implies unified frameworks for analysis.
This paper formalises regime stability across physics, engineering, and complex systems as a function of invariant-preserving admissibility thresholds. Rather than proposing new physical laws, the Paton System is articulated as a structural integration framework clarifying how dimensionless invariants, conserved quantities, and load-distribution constraints govern lawful continuation. Regime continuity is expressed through bounded inequality conditions on scale-bridge invariant functionals κ. The distinction between invariant preservation and analytic compressibility is clarified using the classical three-body problem. Stability, chaos, and collapse are shown to be governed by invariant-bounded continuation rather than degradation of law. The contribution is structural integration rather than empirical novelty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew John Paton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: