Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This cross-sectional study reveals that foveal bulge prevalence declines with age, suggesting its role as a marker in healthy adults.
Background: This research compared the relationship between foveal optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and two age measures—biological and chronological—in healthy adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) data from 308 eyes of 154 healthy adults aged 22–89 years. Parameters assessed: foveal thickness, foveal pit depth and diameter, pit slope steepness, and the presence or absence of the foveal bulge. Biological age was calculated using the PhenoAge algorithm. Results: The core geometry of the foveal pit showed no significant dependence on either type of age (all p ≥ 0.66). In contrast, the foveal bulge prevalence declined significantly with age (adjusted p = 0.011 for chronological age, p = 0.005 for biological age; OR per year ≈0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98 for both age models). Model-predicted prevalence decreased from approximately 93% in younger adults to 60–68% in the 60–74-year-old group. Conclusion: The foveal architecture remains structurally stable throughout adulthood. The foveal bulge emerges as a sensitive qualitative marker of age-related changes. Biological age does not provide additional predictive value over chronological age for foveal structural parameters under physiological aging conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalatyan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: