Key result
HFrEF is linked to ~233% higher 15-year mortality versus pEF in adult congenital heart disease.
Why the study?
The prognostic role of LVEF-based heart failure classification had not been evaluated in adults with congenital heart disease due to anatomic and physiologic heterogeneity.
Does the presence of HFrEF or HFmrEF increase mortality risk in adults with congenital heart disease compared to preserved EF?
Does the presence of HFrEF or HFmrEF increase mortality risk in adults with congenital heart disease compared to preserved EF?
In adults with congenital heart disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (both HFmrEF and HFrEF) is associated with a significantly increased risk of long-term mortality compared to preserved ejection fraction.
ABSTRACT Background In the acquired heart disease population, heart failure (HF) is broadly classified based on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) as HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). The prognostic role of this LVEF-based HF classification has not been evaluated in the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population because of anatomic and physiologic heterogeneity within this population. The current study aimed to address this knowledge gap, by asssessing the prevalence, predictors (correlates), and prognostic implications of HFrEF in adults with CHD. Methods Retrospective cohort study of adults with CHD and morphologic LV as the systemic ventricle. Patients were classified as HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 41-49%), and pEF (LVEF ≥50%). Results Of 7,981 patients, 7,203 (90%) had pEF, 451 (6%) had HFmrEF, and 327 (4%) had HFrEF. The correlates of HFrEF were older age, male sex, pacemaker implantation, multiple prior sternotomies, and acquired comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes and atrial fibrillation. The 15-year mortality risk was 18%, 36% and 67% in pEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups, respectively (p<0.001). Both HFmrEF (adjusted HR 1.64, [95%CI 1.29; 2.09], p<0.001), and HFrEF (adjusted HR 3.33, [95%CI 2.72; 4.27], p<0.001) were associated with mortality on multivariable analysis. Conclusions Given the elevated risk of mortality in patients with LV systolic dysfunction (both mrEF and rEF), and the emerging data suggesting efficacy of HF therapy in patients with CHD, there is an urgent need to implement HF therapy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellabbad et al. (2026) studied this question. In adults with congenital heart disease, 15-year mortality was 18% (pEF), 36% (HFmrEF), and 67% (HFrEF), with HFmrEF and HFrEF increasing mortality risk (HR 1.64 and 3.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: