Randomized controlled trial compares analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine liposome and ropivacaine for TAPB in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, suggesting advantages of BLIS.
Postoperative pain management is critical for optimizing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), where transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is a standard analgesic technique. Ropivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for TAPB in LSG, has a short duration of action (4–6 h), which may be insufficient to control pain for up to 72 h and increase opioid dependence. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension (BLIS) provides extended analgesia (24–72 h) but has not been rigorously compared to ropivacaine in LSG-specific TAPB regarding 72-h analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effects, or ERAS-related outcomes. This randomized controlled trial was designed to fill this evidence gap. In a single-center randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing LSG were randomized to receive TAPB with either bupivacaine liposomal suspension (n = 30) or ropivacaine (n = 30). The primary outcome was the VAS score from 4- to 72-h postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included analgesic drug use, motor function, sleep quality, and adverse events. Compared with Group R, patients in Group B exhibited lower VAS scores from 4 to 72 h postoperatively, significantly reduced patient-controlled analgesia use, and markedly less need for rescue NSAIDs—approximately 75% lower than Group R (6.7% vs. 30%, P = 0.02). Although both groups ambulated within 24 h, no significant differences were observed in deep sleep proportion (24.3% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.90) or incidence of adverse events (20% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.50). BLIS offers prolonged analgesic effects, extending up to 72 h, and significantly reduces the reliance on additional analgesics, making it a valuable option in multimodal pain management for LSG. However, its impact on enhancing ERAS-related outcomes requires further investigation. Trial registration registration number ChiCTR2500104979, registration date 2025–06-26 00:00:00 (retrospectively registered).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: