Key result
Adenosine boluses induce predictable hypotension during cerebral aneurysm clipping in a patient with continuous CRT-D pacing.
Why the study?
Because adenosine cannot induce asystole in paced patients, its usefulness for neurosurgical flow control during cerebral aneurysm clipping is uncertain.
Does high-dose adenosine produce predictable hypotension for temporary flow control in a continuously paced patient undergoing cerebral aneurysm clipping?
Does high-dose adenosine produce predictable hypotension for temporary flow control in a continuously paced patient undergoing cerebral aneurysm clipping?
Adenosine can effectively induce predictable hypotension for temporary flow control during complex cerebrovascular surgery even in continuously paced patients.
May support adenosine for flow control in continuously paced patients; extends evidence but remains hypothesis-generating pending validation.
A patient with a high ventricular pacing burden managed by a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillation (CRT-D) device, undergoing cerebral aneurysm clipping, required a strategy for brief, controlled reductions in cerebral perfusion pressure. Because adenosine cannot induce asystole in paced patients, its usefulness for neurosurgical flow control is uncertain. After reprogramming the device to dual pace, no sense, no response (DOO) mode with defibrillation therapies disabled, adenosine boluses were administered during clip application and produced predictable hypotension despite uninterrupted pacing. This case demonstrates that adenosine can be an effective and predictable hypotensive agent even in continuously paced patients, expanding available techniques for temporary flow control in complex cerebrovascular surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denis et al. (2026) studied this question. Adenosine boluses induced predictable hypotension during cerebral aneurysm clipping in a patient with continuous ventricular pacing after CRT-D device reprogramming.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: