Key result
Non-contact 24-GHz Doppler radar estimates human heart rate with >98% accuracy.
Why the study?
Traditional frequency-domain methods for non-contact heart rate estimation struggle when the fundamental frequency is weak or overlaps with respiratory components.
Does a harmonic-based method using 24-GHz Doppler radar accurately estimate heart rate in humans and anesthetized cats?
Does a harmonic-based method using 24-GHz Doppler radar accurately estimate heart rate in humans and anesthetized cats?
A novel harmonic-based method using 24-GHz Doppler radar provides highly accurate non-contact heart rate estimation in both humans and anesthetized cats.
May enable non-contact HR monitoring where electrodes are impractical; extends Doppler radar validation via harmonic processing.
This study presents a harmonic-based method for non-contact heart rate (HR) estimation from continuous-wave (CW) Doppler radar signals, validated across multiple species including humans and small animals (cat). Traditional frequency-domain methods struggle when the HR fundamental frequency is weak or overlaps with respiratory components. The proposed approach addresses this by identifying three higher-order HR harmonics (2nd, 3rd, and 4th) then reconstructing the HR fundamental frequency from their integer ratios (3/2, 4/3, 2/1). The algorithm processes 20-s sliding windows (1-s overlap) using bandpass filtering to remove respiratory components and HR fundamental while preserving higher harmonics, followed by Power Spectral Density (PSD) analysis. When a complete harmonic set cannot be found, the proposed algorithm switches to harmonic pair detection, enhancing robustness when one harmonic is absent or attenuated. Besides, an adaptive tolerance mechanism enables detection under non-ideal conditions. The method was validated using a public human dataset and an experimental cat dataset with varied positions (supine/prone) and anesthesia levels (1–3% isoflurane). For humans, the algorithm achieved HR Accuracy consistently above 98% with an average RMSE of 1.33 bpm (MAPE: 1.29%, MAE: 0.86 bpm) and Bland-Altman bias below 0.9 bpm. For the cat dataset, performance was even better with HR Accuracy remaining above 99%, an average RMSE of 0.39 bpm (MAPE: 0.22%, MAE: 0.30 bpm), and bias below 0.14 bpm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question. The 24-GHz Doppler radar harmonic-based method estimated heart rate with >98% accuracy in humans (RMSE 1.33 bpm) and >99% accuracy in anesthetized cats (RMSE 0.39 bpm).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: