Key result
The proposed non-contact heart rate estimation method using adaptive notch filters achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 5.24% in humans and 7.89% in a dog, outperforming conventional methods.
Why the study?
Respiration harmonics and body movement artifacts degrade the accuracy of continuous-wave Doppler radar for non-contact heart rate estimation.
A novel Doppler radar-based method using adaptive notch filters accurately estimates heart rate in humans and unrestrained animals by effectively eliminating respiration harmonics and motion artifacts.
May improve non-contact HR estimation accuracy; leaves open validation in larger clinical cohorts before adoption.
Continuous-wave Doppler radar is an established method for non-contact heart rate estimation. The output signal of the Doppler radar includes the fundamental wave of a heartbeat, heartbeat harmonics, the fundamental wave of respiration, respiration harmonics, and artifacts due to body movement. The respiration harmonics and artifacts degrade the accuracy of heart rate estimation. To this end, a novel heart rate estimation method is proposed that uses adaptive notch filters (ANFs). First, the proposed system estimates respiration frequency. Next, cascaded notch filters, the notch frequencies of which are controlled by the estimated respiration frequency, eliminate respiration harmonics; thus, the accuracy of heart rate estimation improves. In addition, the proposed method uses an ANF based on all-pass filter and an adaptive algorithm to estimate heart rate. The ANF is robust against disturbances, allowing the proposed method to improve the estimation accuracy in the presence of moving artifacts. The simulation results for human subjects show that MAPE, MAE, MSE, and RMSE of the proposed method are 5.24%, 4.00, 28.38, and 5.26, respectively; thus, they can be reduced up to fourth-order respiration harmonics. In an experiment on a dog not restrained in a cage, the proposed method, handling up to the fifth-order respiration harmonic, yields MAPE of 7.89%, MAE of 5.34, MSE of 96.11, and RMSE of 9.80. Thus, the proposed method shows better estimation accuracy than any other conventional method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tazen et al. (2023) studied Healthy subjects (heart rate measurement) (n=9). Adaptive notch filter (ANF) and respiration harmonics elimination filter (RHEF) vs. Conventional heart rate estimation methods (autocorrelation, FFT, CWT, etc.) was evaluated on Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of heart rate estimation. The proposed non-contact heart rate estimation method using adaptive notch filters achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 5.24% in humans and 7.89% in a dog, outperforming conventional methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: