Retrospective analysis reveals that the CALLY index predicts treatment outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, suggesting improved patient management strategies.
Background/Objectives: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and remains incurable in approximately 30–40% of patients despite advances in immunochemotherapy. Although gene expression profiling has improved risk stratification, there is an ongoing need for non-invasive, cost-effective, and clinically practical biomarkers to identify patients at high risk of treatment resistance or relapse (R/R). Systemic inflammation plays a pivotal role in DLBCL pathogenesis, impacting both tumor progression and treatment response. The C-reactive protein–albumin–lymphocyte (CALLY) index, integrating markers of inflammation, nutritional status, and immune competence, has demonstrated prognostic relevance in solid tumors; however, its relevance in hematologic malignancies remains unexplored. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 180 adults with newly diagnosed DLBCL, NOS (not otherwise specified) who received frontline rituximab-based immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP or CHOP-like regimens) between January 2014 and December 2019 at three tertiary centers in Serbia. The median age was 67 years (IQR 59–73), and 56.1% were female. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined 6.5 as the optimal CALLY index cut-off (AUC 0.744, 95% CI 0.670–0.817; p < 0.001). Results: A low CALLY index (<6.5) was significantly associated with adverse clinical features, including anemia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and β2-microglobulin, poor ECOG performance status, bulky disease, advanced stage, and unfavorable IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI scores (all p < 0.001). In contrast, no associations were observed with tumor subtype, immunophenotype, or comorbidities. Furthermore, patients with CALLY <6.5 showed lower overall response rates to treatment (59.6% vs. 85.5%, p < 0.001) and higher relapse rates (21.0% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.014). They also experienced reduced 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) (all p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a low CALLY index independently predicted poorer OS (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.13–3.67; p = 0.017) and EFS (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.13–3.14; p = 0.015). In addition, it independently identified patients at risk of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.02–10.10; p = 0.04), outperforming standard prognostic indices. Conclusions: The CALLY index is a simple, low-cost, and widely accessible biomarker that independently predicts prognosis in DLBCL, NOS. It outperforms standard indices in identifying R/R cases. The CALLY index may enhance risk stratification and guide individualized treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cvetković et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: