Key result
AI-driven multimodal data integration improves HF management from prediction to prognosis despite clinical implementation challenges.
Why the study?
Despite artificial intelligence showing potential in heart failure management, several challenges remain before clinical implementation, including model selection, generalization, interpretability, and real-world reliability.
Design
Review
Await further data before adopting multimodal AI in HF care; leaves open generalization and interpretability for targeted research.
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition characterized by high morbidity and mortality worldwide, imposing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including machine learning, deep learning, and large language models, have demonstrated great potential in HF management. By integrating multimodal data, such as electronic health records and medical imaging, AI models address limitations in risk prediction, phenotyping, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, offering novel insights to improve the quality of life for HF patients. However, several challenges remain before AI can be reliably implemented in clinical practice, including model selection, model generalization, interpretability, and limited reliability in real-world settings. In this review, we systematically summarize recent advances in application of AI in HF management across multiple domains, including inspection, monitoring, treatment, and integration. We further discuss key real-world challenges to implementation, and outline future directions for the development of intelligent HF management. In addition, representative application cases are presented to illustrate how AI technologies can be developed and translated into clinical practice, with the aim of providing practical insights and methodological guidance for researchers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question. AI-driven multimodal data integration improves heart failure management across risk prediction, diagnosis, phenotyping, treatment, and prognosis, but challenges remain for clinical implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: