Review articles highlight surgical techniques and outcomes in carinal resections, indicating effective airway management strategies.
Background: Carinal resections remain a challenging and demanding surgical technique for both the patient and medical professionals. The most common indications are adenoid cystic carcinoma and bronchogenic carcinoma. There have been no randomized controlled trials because of the low incidence of pathologic processes suited to carinal resections and the difficulties associated with designing such studies. Methods: The known data are limited to a few single-institutional, retrospective studies over the last several decades. In this review article, we focus on the available data regarding surgical techniques and the types of ventilation that can help in the construction of the anastomosis—the most crucial part of the operation. Important issues regarding carinal resections are discussed in detail. Results: The available literature is reviewed in detail regarding indications, surgical techniques and approaches, types of ventilation, the rates of morbidity and mortality, and 5-year survival. The authors present their experience with two patients, where they utilized ECMO and crossfield ventilation. The role of minimally invasive surgery in carinal resections is also discussed. Conclusions: Carinal resections are complex surgical procedures, but acceptable mortality and morbidity rates can be achieved in carefully selected patients. Excellent cooperation between the surgeon and anesthesiologist is essential in the construction of the anastomosis. Various types of airway management, especially ECMO, help to reduce complication rates and facilitate secure airway reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juhos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: