Key result
Arteriosclerotic vascular aging linked to ~76% higher stroke risk, while atherosclerosis predicts coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
It was unknown how different manifestations of vascular aging cluster at the individual level and whether individuals with different patterns have different risk of progression to overt CVD.
Do distinct patterns of vascular aging (arteriosclerosis or atherosclerosis) predict incident cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in adults without prevalent CVD compared to healthy vascular aging?
Observational (n=8,360)
Yes
Do distinct patterns of vascular aging (arteriosclerosis or atherosclerosis) predict incident cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in adults without prevalent CVD compared to healthy vascular aging?
Effect estimate: For stroke: cluster 2 HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.06-2.94), cluster 3 HR 1.57 (95% CI 0.94-2.62); For CHD: cluster 3 HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.08-2.16), cluster 2 HR 1.38 (95% CI 0.96-1.98); Combined stroke and CHD: cluster 2 HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.12-2.04), cluster 3 HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.11-1.98); All-cause mortality: cluster 2 HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.02-2.21), cluster 3 HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.01-2.17)
Distinct patterns of vascular aging (arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis) identified via carotid ultrasound independently predict incident stroke and CHD, improving risk stratification beyond traditional risk scores.
Vascular aging clusters may enhance risk stratification beyond traditional scores in adults 50-75; extends single-measure studies supporting independent CVD prediction.
Vascular aging is the accumulation of functional and structural changes of vessels throughout life. While earlier studies have shown that single manifestation of vascular aging is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), it is unknown how the different manifestations of vascular aging cluster at the individual level, and whether individuals with different vascular aging patterns have different risk of progression to overt CVD. Here, we identify three patterns of vascular aging including healthy vascular aging (HVA), arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis. Vascular aging manifestations were evaluated non-invasively by carotid ultrasound methods. The main and the validation analysis were conducted on 8360 and 2086 participants in two separate prospective cohorts. We find that arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis compared to HVA clusters are independent predictors of CVD, and improve risk stratification for stroke among those at intermediate risk. Vascular aging evaluation may help identify those at increased risk of CVD. How the multiple manifestations of vascular aging cluster and predict overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unknown. Here, the authors identify three patterns of vascular aging, showing their independent association with incident CVD, and their added value for stroke risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sloten et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Adults aged 50-75 years without prevalent cardiovascular disease undergoing vascular aging assessment by carotid ultrasound (n=8,360). Clusters of vascular aging assessed by carotid ultrasound (healthy vascular aging, arteriosclerosis, atherosclerosis) vs. Cluster 1 healthy vascular aging was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease events (stroke, coronary heart disease [CHD]), combined CVD (stroke and CHD), and all-cause mortality (For stroke: cluster 2 HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.06-2.94), cluster 3 HR 1.57 (95% CI 0.94-2.62); For CHD: cluster 3 HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.08-2.16), cluster 2 HR 1.38 (95% CI 0.96-1.98); Combined stroke and CHD: cluster 2 HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.12-2.04), cluster 3 HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.11-1.98); All-cause mortality: cluster 2 HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.02-2.21), cluster 3 HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.01-2.17)). Clusters of vascular aging characterized by arteriosclerosis increased stroke risk by 76% (HR 1.76) and those characterized by atherosclerosis increased coronary heart disease risk by 53% (HR 1.53) compared to healthy vascular aging in adults aged 50-75 years over 8.75 years of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: