PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026BMC Psychology2 citationsOpen Access

A qualitative study of physical education teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence and influencing factors based on social cognitive theory

WYWeilei YangHCHaidong ChenFRFeixue Rao

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore physical education teachers' perceptions of artificial intelligence and the factors influencing their acceptance.
  • Qualitative research design using purposive sampling.
  • Semi-structured interviews conducted with 16 physical education teachers.
  • Data coding and thematic analysis performed using NVivo software.
  • Physical education teachers' acceptance of AI is influenced by personal, environmental, situational, and resource factors.
  • Self-efficacy is identified as the core factor driving acceptance.
  • Outcome expectancy significantly impacts teachers' behavioural decisions regarding AI.

Abstract

With the application of artificial intelligence in physical education, how physical education teachers understand and embrace AI technology in their actual teaching has become a key issue in the reform of physical education. However, existing research has paid insufficient attention to physical education teachers’ cognitive states and their influencing factors, making it difficult to provide a basis for effectively integrating AI technology into physical education classrooms. This study aims to reveal physical education teachers’ perceptions of AI and clarify the core factors influencing their acceptance of AI technology. Based on Social Cognitive Theory, the research primarily sets three objectives: First, to analyse physical education teachers’ basic perceptions and attitudes toward AI; second, to examine the personal, environmental, and behavioural factors affecting their acceptance of AI technology; and third, to construct a model of the mechanism underlying physical education teachers’ acceptance of AI technology. This study employed qualitative research methods, utilising purposive sampling to conduct semi-structured interviews with 16 physical education teachers. Data coding and thematic analysis were performed using NVivo software. Findings revealed that a combination of multidimensional factors, including personal, environmental, situational, and resource factors, influences physical education teachers’ acceptance of AI. Among these, self-efficacy serves as the core factor driving physical education teachers’ acceptance of AI. Outcome expectancy significantly influences behavioural decisions, while subjective norms mediate the relationship between self-efficacy and these decisions. By integrating SCT with SDT, this study provides a more context-sensitive explanation of PE teachers’ AI acceptance in embodied teaching settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada804bc08abd80d5bb2ffhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04295-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A289: Challenges and Strategies for PE Teachers in the AI Era2026
  2. 2EVALUATING AI KNOWLEDGE AND PREPAREDNESS OF PRE-SERVICE PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHERS2026
  3. 3Exploring the link between AI usage intention and digital competence among college PE teachers: A moderated mediation model based on SCT and UTAUT2025
  4. 4Exploring Teacher Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Study of Pedagogical Beliefs, Technology Use, and the Impact of Experience on AI Adoption2026
  5. 5A119: AI-Enabled Physical Education2026