Key result
ENSAT Risk Score accurately predicts outcomes in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma patients receiving systemic therapy.
Why the study?
Does the ENSAT Risk Score predict outcomes in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma receiving systemic therapy?
Does the ENSAT Risk Score predict outcomes in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma receiving systemic therapy?
The ENSAT Risk Score is a practical prognostic tool based on clinical and biochemical markers for patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ENSAT Risk Score for prognostication in advanced ACC on systemic therapy; extends validation to treated patients with routine markers.
OBJECTIVE: Advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is treated with mitotane alone or combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy, yet outcomes remain poor and prognostic models in this setting are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of clinical parameters in a large cohort of patients with advanced ACC undergoing systemic therapy. METHODS: Multicenter, international cohort study investigating 418 patients with advanced ACC (61.5% = women, median age = 52 years) from 11 centers. Patients received mitotane monotherapy (n = 161), etoposide + doxorubicin + cisplatin ± mitotane (n = 178), or second-line regimens (gemcitabine + capecitabine ± mitotane or temozolomide + mitotane, n = 79). Variables included age, cortisol excess, performance status (ECOG-PS), tumor burden, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at start of therapy. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and best objective response. RESULTS: Tumor burden, cortisol excess, ECOG-PS, and NLR ≥5 independently predicted shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55-2.68). We developed an integrated ENSAT Risk Score for Advanced ACC combining these variables: tumor burden (0-2), cortisol excess (0/1), ECOG-PS (0-2), and NLR (0/1). A score >2 (poor-risk) was significantly associated with worse OS and TTP across all treatment groups (HRs for OS: 3.05-3.96; TTP: 2.53-3.08). It also predicted poorer response to mitotane (P < .01) and second-line therapies (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The ENSAT Risk Score for Advanced ACC is a practical, prognostic tool for patients with advanced ACC receiving systemic therapy. Based on accessible clinical and biochemical markers, it can support treatment decisions and facilitate informed discussions in routine care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangone et al. (2026) studied this question. The ENSAT Risk Score accurately predicts outcomes in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma patients receiving systemic therapy using accessible clinical and biochemical markers.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: