Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey examines facilitators and barriers of PR referral in pulmonologists in India, indicating potential improvement strategies.
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based treatment for chronic respiratory diseases that improves physical and psychosocial health. However, global referral rates remain low, especially in resource-limited settings where unique barriers complicate the referral process. This survey examined the facilitators of and barriers to PR referral among pulmonologists in India. A cross-sectional survey of pulmonologists in India was conducted via a validated questionnaire (content validation index of 0.93) with open- and closed-ended questions on facilitators and barriers to the referral of an individual to a PR. A total of 114 pulmonologists participated in the survey. Among the pulmonologists, facilitators of PR referrals included the availability of a PR centre within the hospital or nearby (n = 71, 81%), the availability of trained professionals at the PR centre (n = 67, 76%), positive beliefs about PR (n = 64, 73%) and major barriers were limited centres offering PR (n = 70, 80%), and financial constraints for patients (n = 58, 66%). According to the pulmonologists, the factors that facilitated patients’ participation in the PR program were good family support (n = 73, 86%), patients’ level of motivation (n = 68, 80%), easy accessibility to the rehabilitation centre (n = 66, 78%), and the barriers were a lack of awareness of the benefits of the PR (n = 59, 69%), and inaccessibility to the rehabilitation program (n = 55, 65%). Our survey identified various facilitators and barriers encountered by pulmonologists while referring patients to PRs. These factors can inform the development of context-specific referral pathways to improve PR access in resource-limited settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Augustine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: