Research evaluates hypothermia's effect on limiting radiation-induced testicular damage in mice, suggesting protective benefits.
Ionizing radiation damages testicular tissue, impairing spermatogenesis and fertility. Therapeutic hypothermia confers cytoprotection; its ability to limit radiation-induced testicular injury is unclear. We tested whether hypothermia mitigates irradiation-induced testicular injury and explored underlying mechanisms. Mice were randomized to four groups: normothermia sham (NT + sham), hypothermia sham (HT + sham), normothermia with irradiation (NT + IR; 5 Gy whole-body X-ray), or hypothermia with irradiation (HT + IR). Temperatures were maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C (normothermia) or 32 ± 0.5 °C (hypothermia) for 2 h before and after irradiation. Outcomes at 12 h and 30 d included histological evaluation, organ weight measurements, sperm analyses, TUNEL apoptosis, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analyses for Bax/Bcl-2 expression, and Western blot analysis for p-Akt/Akt. At 30 d, irradiation reduced testicular and epididymal weights in the NT + IR group; hypothermia significantly attenuated epididymal weight loss and showed a nonsignificant trend toward higher testis weight in the HT + IR group (p = 0.1064). H&E morphometry indicated preserved seminiferous architecture, with greater germinal epithelial height and tubular diameter in HT + IR vs. NT + IR. Irradiation increased sperm abnormalities and decreased motility and counts in NT + IR. Although motility improved in HT + IR compared with NT + IR, hypothermia did not rescue spermatid number and showed a trend toward higher total sperm counts (p = 0.0560). At 12 h, irradiation increased TUNEL-positive nuclei and the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, whereas hypothermia lowered both in irradiated testes. Hypothermia also increased p-Akt (p-Akt/Akt) only in irradiated animals, indicating early activation of pro-survival signaling. Collectively, hypothermia partially mitigated radiation-induced testicular injury, supporting its potential to preserve reproductive capacity during radiation therapy and after emergency exposures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: