Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved disturbance rejection in power converters using a novel control technique, implying enhanced performance.
This study proposes a systematic approach for implementing discrete-time Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control in the closed-loop regulation of power converters. The continuous-time Linear Extended State Observer was discretized using the zero-order hold method to obtain a current estimator-based Linear Extended State Observer that is suitable for real-time implementation. The design considerations for discrete-time Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control, including the selection of observer and controller parameters and the sampling period, are addressed. For performance comparison, a PI controller was designed and implemented in discrete time. The control schemes were evaluated via MATLAB/Simulink (2025b) simulations and real-time closed-loop experiments on a microcontroller to assess the transient response, disturbance rejection capability, and steady-state accuracy of the buck converter. The simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the discrete-time Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control incorporating a current-estimator-based Linear Extended State Observer significantly outperforms the PI controller in terms of transient response and disturbance rejection capability. From this perspective, this study provides a meaningful contribution to the limited literature on linear extended state observer-based discrete-time Active Disturbance Rejection Control methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onur Demirel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: