Key result
Only ~38% of German gynecologic clinicians report routine ERAS use, citing knowledge and resource barriers.
Why the study?
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery adoption in gynecological departments remains inconsistent, and the underlying implementation challenges are poorly understood.
What are the key barriers, facilitators, and preferred implementation strategies influencing ERAS adoption in German gynecological departments?
What are the key barriers, facilitators, and preferred implementation strategies influencing ERAS adoption in German gynecological departments?
ERAS implementation in German gynecological departments is limited by knowledge gaps and personnel shortages, highlighting the need for targeted educational strategies.
Knowledge gaps and resource shortages should prompt educational programs for ERAS in German gynecology; extends implementation research while leaving optimal strategies open.
Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative outcomes and promote multidisciplinary, evidence-based perioperative care. However, ERAS adoption in gynecological departments remains inconsistent, and the underlying implementation challenges are poorly understood. Objective: To identify key barriers, facilitators, and preferred implementation strategies influencing ERAS adoption in German gynecological departments, and to assess whether clinicians’ ERAS knowledge or institutional certification shapes these perceptions. Methods: We conducted a nationwide, web-based cross-sectional survey of gynecologic clinicians in Germany. The questionnaire assessed ERAS-related knowledge, current implementation status, and perceived barriers, facilitators, and strategies. Statistical analyses included equality of proportions tests, logistic regression, and internal consistency measurement. Results: A total of 116 clinicians participated; 66 provided data on barriers and 64 on facilitators and strategies. Only 37.9% reported routine ERAS use. The most frequently identified barriers were limited ERAS knowledge (40.9% “very important”) and insufficient personnel resources (40.9%). The strongest facilitators were improved patient well-being, reduced morbidity, and higher patient satisfaction (each >60% “very important”). High-impact implementation strategies included informational materials, workshops, and online training. Well-informed clinicians had significantly higher odds of reporting a positive professional impact of ERAS (OR = 9.0, p = 0.001). Conclusions: ERAS implementation in gynecological settings remains restricted by staff knowledge gaps and personnel limitations. Patient-centered benefits and interactive educational strategies serve as powerful facilitators. Enhanced staff education and multidisciplinary support structures may substantially improve ERAS uptake and contribute to greater professional satisfaction among clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiel et al. (2026) studied this question. Only 37.9% of German gynecologic clinicians reported routine ERAS use, with limited knowledge and resources cited as major barriers to implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: