Key result
ERAS-guided gynecologic surgery was associated with low specific patient knowledge, with positive experiences reported when patient expectations aligned with the physical experience of care.
Why the study?
ERAS pathways improve outcomes in gynecologic surgery, but data reporting the benefit from the patient's perspective are limited.
Patient knowledge of ERAS pathways in gynecologic surgery is low, highlighting a need for improved, personalized patient education to enhance engagement and outcomes.
Supports tailored ERAS education to align expectations; leaves open effects on recovery outcomes in gynecologic surgery.
• Awareness of ERAS was low in participants undergoing ERAS-guided gynecologic/oncology surgery. • Participant expectations were shaped by previous health experiences and information provided by healthcare providers. • Positive experiences of ERAS-guided surgery were reported when expectations aligned with delivery of care. • Patient education comprises a key element of the ERAS pathway, thus there is a need for significant improvement. • Providing personalised information can empower patients to actively engage in their care, which is required. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have demonstrated improvements in outcomes following benign gynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery. However, there is limited data reporting the benefit of ERAS from the patient’s perspective. This study aimed to explore patient knowledge of and experience with ERAS-guided surgery. This interpretive descriptive study included participants who had undergone ERAS-guided gynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery in Alberta, Canada using convenience sampling. Semi-structured interviews explored patient knowledge of ERAS, overall experience with surgery and recommended changes for surgical care. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Eight females aged 26–76 years old participated in the study who had gynecologic (n = 4) and gynecologic oncology (n = 4) surgery. Six themes central to participant experience of ERAS-guided surgery were identified: patient expectations, individual motivation, values and support, healthcare provider communication, trust in healthcare providers, COVID-19 and care co-ordination. Overall, specific knowledge of ERAS was low. Expectations were set by previous experience of healthcare (previous surgery or occupation), as well as information provided by healthcare professionals. Participants whose expectations aligned with physical experience of ERAS provided favourable perspectives. Participants recommended improving the quality, relevance and availability of information and establishing accessible follow up strategies. Based on the finding that knowledge about ERAS was minimal, we advocate for improved education pertaining to ERAS recommendations. Acknowledging patients’ expertise and motivation to engage in their care maybe one strategy to improve compliance with ERAS guidelines and improve outcomes for both patients and the healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkins et al. (2024) studied Gynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery (n=8). ERAS-guided surgery was evaluated on Patient knowledge of and experience with ERAS-guided surgery. ERAS-guided gynecologic surgery was associated with low specific patient knowledge, with positive experiences reported when patient expectations aligned with the physical experience of care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: