Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares machine learning techniques for porosity prediction in sandstone reservoirs, indicating improved accuracy and reliability.
Accurate porosity prediction is essential for reliable reservoir characterization in data-limited and heterogeneous formation. Traditional approaches generally have a difficulty handling the inherent complexities and uncertainties of well log data. This study applies and compares three machine learning (ML) approaches, including Artificial Neural Network optimized with Levenberg-Marquardt (ANN-LM), Random Forest (RF), Fuzzy Logic (FL) along with a baseline Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model, to estimate total porosity from standard geophysical well-logs in three wells from the Mazalai Gas Field (MGF), Kohat Basin, Pakistan. The models utilize sonic, neutron porosity, bulk density, and gamma ray as input parameters. The ANN-LM model was trained using backpropagation and K-fold cross-validation. RF was implemented as an ensemble of decision trees with feature ranking, FL employed Gaussian membership functions in ten bins, and MLR served as a baseline linear method. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean square error (RMSE). ANN-LM showed the strongest generalizability and robustness, achieving R² = 0.99 and RMSE = 3.5 pu by effectively minimizing errors in complex, nonlinear and heterogenous data. RF and FL performed reasonably well achieving R 2 equal to 0.89 and 0.85 respectively, but showed reduced generalization to unseen data. MLR demonstrated the lowest performance acquiring R 2 =0.82. Additionally, A Taylor diagram analysis revealed that ANN-LM provided the most accurate and statistically consistent predictions, closely matching the reference data. These results show machine learning, especially well-optimised neural networks, greatly improves porosity prediction from logs, strengthening reservoir evaluation and development planning in MGF-like settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: